Document Type : Original Article


1 Assistant Professor of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran

2 Post Graduate Student, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

3 Post Graduate Student, Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran


Aim: This study aims to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of different combinations of retainer wires and enamel preparation methods.
Methods: A total of 180 extracted mandibular bovine incisors were randomly divided into nine groups of 20 paired teeth each. Three techniques were employed to prepare the enamel: acid etches only, Er:YAG laser before acid etch, and sandblast before acid etch. The retainer wires, including Bond-A-Braid, GAC Wildcat Twistflex Wire, and TruForce coaxial wire, were bonded with the adhesive Transbond LR and SBS values were measured. The two-way ANOVA test was used to evaluate the effect of the conditioning method in combination with the retainer wire type and the interaction of two variables. Pairwise comparisons were done using the Tukey post hoc test. A value of P≤0.05 was considered to be significant for all statistical tests.
Results: The highest shear bond strength value was found for sandblasted surface bonded with Bond-A-Braid wire. The combination of acid-etched enamel/GAC Wildcat Twistflex wire revealed the lowest value of the SBS. Statistically significant differences did not exist for the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) scores among the study groups.
Conclusion: Sandblasting and laser irradiation before the acid etching significantly increased the SBS. Differences in the SBS values of different wires were insignificant.


Main Subjects

  1. Tracey S, Gracco A. Lasers in orthodontics. In: Orthodontics: current principle and techniques. Graber LW, Vanarsdall RL, Vig KWL (eds.). 5th Ed. St Louis: Mosby, 2012; p. 1051–1092.
  2. Khoroushi M, Kachuie M. Prevention and treatment of white spot lesions in orthodontic patients. Contemp Clin Dent. 2017;8(1):11-19. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_216_17. PMID: 28566845.
  3. Fornaini C, Brulat N, Milia G, Rockl A, Rocca JP. The use of sub-ablative Er: YAG laser irradiation in prevention of dental caries during orthodontic treatment. Laser Ther. 2014;23(3):173-181. doi: 10.5978/islsm.14-OR-13. PMID: 25368443.
  4. de Jesus Tavarez RR, Bezerra GL, de Souza Penha KJ, Torres CR, Firoozmand LM. Er: YAG pre-treatment for bonding of orthodontic bracket: 1 year of in vitro treatment. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2017; 9:19-25. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S129628. PMID: 28392716.
  5. Oshagh M, Pakshir HR, Najafi HZ, Naseri MM, Nasrabadi NI, Torkan S. Comparison of the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets in bonding and rebonding: preparation with laser versus conventional acid etch technique. Photomed Laser Surg. 2013;31(8):360-364. doi: 10.1089/pho.2013.3477. PMID: 23865860.
  6. Contreras-Bulnes R, Scougall-Vilchis RJ, RodríguezVilchis LE, Centeno-Pedraza C, Olea-Mejía OF, Alcántara-Galena MD. Evaluation of self-etching adhesive and Er: YAG laser conditioning on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Sci World J. 2013;2013: 1-5. doi: 10.1155/2013/719182.
  7. Najafi HZ, Moshkelgosha V, Khanchemehr A, Alizade A, Mokhtar A. The Effect of Four Surface Treatment Methods on the Shear Bond Strength of Metallic Brackets to the Fluorosed Enamel. J Dent. 2015;16(3):251-59. PMID: 26535405.
  8. Shahabi M, Ahrari F, Mohamadipour H, Moosavi H. Microleakage and shear bond strength of orthodontc brackets bonded to hypomineralized enamel following different surface preparations. J Clin Exp Dent. 2014;6(2):110-115. doi: 10.4317/jced.51254. PMID: 24790708.
  9. Ozdemir F, Cakan U, Gonul N, Germec Cakan D. Orthodontic bonding to acid-or laser-etched prebleached enamel. Korean J Orthod. 2013; 43(3):141-6. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2013.43.3.141. PMID: 23814709.
  10. Erdur EA, Basciftci FA. Effect of Ti: sapphire laser on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to ceramic surfaces. Lasers Surg Med. 2015;47(6):512-9. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22371. PMID: 25994849.
  11. Hosseini MH, Sobouti F, Etemadi A, Chiniforush N, Shariati M. Shear bond strength of metal brackets to feldspathic porcelain treated by Nd: YAG laser and hydrofluoric acid. Lasers Med Sci. 2015; 30(2):837-41. doi: 10.1007/s10103 013-1458-3. PMID: 24142046.
  12. Akpinar YZ, Irgin C, Yavuz T, Aslan MA, Kilic HS, Usumez A. Effect of femtosecond laser treatment on the shear bond strength of a metal bracket to prepared porcelain surface. Photomed Laser Surg. 2015;33(4):206-12. doi: 10.1089/pho.2014.3791. PMID: 25790117.
  13. Ahrari F, Akbari M, Akbari J, Dabiri G. Enamel surface roughness after debonding of orthodontic brackets and various clean-up techniques. J Dent (Tehran). 2013;10(1):82-93. PMID: 23724206.
  14. Stein S, Kleye A, Schauseil M, Hellak A, Korbmacher-Steiner H, Braun A. 445-nm diode laser-assisted debonding of self-ligating ceramic brackets. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2017;62(5):513-20. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2016-0027.
  15. Saito A, Namura Y, Isokawa K, Shimizu N. CO2 laser debonding of a ceramic bracket bonded with orthodontic adhesive containing thermal expansion microcapsules. Lasers Med Sci. 2015; 30(2):869-74. doi: 10.1007/s10103-013-1482-3. PMID: 24220847.
  16. Sohrabi A, Jafari S, Kimyai S, Rikhtehgaran S. Er, Cr: YSGG Laser as a Novel Method for Rebonding Failed Ceramic Brackets. Photomed Laser Surg. 2016;34(10):483-86. doi: 10.1089/pho.2014.3868. PMID: 27575835.
  17. Anand P, Anand PB, Prabhakar R, Rajvikram N, Rajakumar P, Atali VR, Saravanan R. Immediate and Delayed Effects of Diode Laser on Debonding of Ceramic Brackets: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016; 17(4):275-81. doi: 10.5005/jpjournals-10024-1841.
  18. Ghazanfari R, Nokhbatolfoghahaei H, Alikhasi M. Laser-Aided Ceramic Bracket Debonding: A Comprehensive Review. Lasers Med Sci. 2016;7(1):2- 11. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2016.02. PMID: 27330690.
  19. Zachrisson BU, Buyukyilmaz AT. Bonding in orthodontics. In: Orthodontics: current principle and techniques. Graber LW, Vanarsdall RL, Vig KWL (eds.). 5th Ed. St Louis: Mosby, 2012;p. 727–784.
  20. Chinvipas N, Hasegawa Y, Terada K. Repeated bonding of fixed retainer increases the risk of enamel fracture. Odontology 2014;102(1):89-97. doi: 10.1007/s10266- 012-0095-9. PMID: 23239387.
  21. Reicheneder C, Hofrichter B, Faltermeier A, Proff P, Lippold C, Kirschneck C. Shear bond strength of different retainer wires and bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process. Head Face Med. 2014;10(1):1-6. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X10-51. PMID: 25429986.
  22. el-Karaksi AO. Effect of laser enamel-etching on the bond strength of resin-bonded retainers. Egypt Dent J. 1994;40(4):897-902. PMID: 9588132.
  23. Oliver RG. The effect of different methods of bracket removal on the amount of residual adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;93(3):196–200. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(88)80003-9. PMID: 2964197.
  24. Schneider E, Ruf S. Upper bonded retainers: Survival and failure rates. Angle Orthod 2011;81(6):1050-6. doi: 10.2319/022211-132.1. PMID: 21657830.
  25. Zachrisson BU. Long-term experience with directbonded retainers: update and clinical advice. J Clin Orthod. 2007;41(12):728-37. PMID: 18192755.
  26. Renkema AM, Renkema A, Bronkhorst E, Katsaros C. Long-term effectiveness of canine-to-canine bonded flexible spiral wire lingual retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139(5):614-621. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.041. PMID: 21536204.
  27. Aldrees AM, Al-Mutairi TK, Hakami ZW, Al-Malki MM. Bonded orthodontic retainers: a comparison of initial bond strength of different wire-andcomposite combinations. J Orofac Orthop . 2010;71(4):290-9. doi: 10.1007/s00056 010-9947- 5 . PMID: 20676816.
  28. Taner T, Aksu M. A prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular lingual retainer survival. Eur J Orthod. 2011;34(4):470-474. doi: 10.1093/ejo/ cjr038. PMID: 21508264.
  29. Hobson RS, McCabe JF, Hogg SD. Bond strength to surface enamel for different tooth types. Dent Mater. 2001;17(2):184-189. doi: 10.1016/s0109- 5641(00)00068-3. PMID: 11163390.
  30. Nakamichi I, Iwaku M, Fusayama T. Bovine teeth as possible substitutes in the adhesion test. J Dent Res. 1983;62(10):1076-18. doi: 10.1177/ 00220345830620101501. PMID: 6352757.
  31. Reicheneder CA, Gedrange T, Lange A, Baumert U, Proff P. Shear and tensile bond strength comparison of various contemporary orthodontic adhesive systems: an in-vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;30;135(4):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.12.001. PMID: 19361721.
  32. Radlanski RJ, Zain ND. Stability of the bonded lingual wire retainer—a study of the initial bond strength. J Orofac Orthop 2004;65(4):321-5. doi: 10.1007/ s00056-004-0401-4. PMID: 15289924.
  33. Baysal A, Uysal T, Gul N, Alan MB, Ramoglu SI. Comparison of three different orthodontic wires for bonded lingual retainer fabrication. Korean J Orthod. 2012;42(1):39-46. doi: 10.4041/kjod. 2012.42.1.39. PMID: 23112930.
  34. Kachoei M, Mohammadi A, Moghaddam ME, Rikhtegaran S, Pourghaznein M, Shirazi S. Comparison of multiple rebond shear strengths of debonded brackets after preparation with sandblasting and CO2 laser. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2016;10(3):148-154. doi: 10.15171/joddd. 2016.024. PMID: 27651880.
  35. Hosseini MH, Hassanpour M, Etemadi A, Omrani LR, Darvishpour H, Chiniforush N. Amalgam Surface Treatment by Different Output Powers of Er: YAG Laser:SEM Evaluation. Lasers Med Sci. 2015;6(4):171- 3. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2015.14. PMID: 26705463.
  36. Oesterle LJ, Shellhart WC, Henderson S. Enhancing wire-composite bond strength of bonded retainers with wire surface treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;119(6):625-631. doi: 10.1067/mod. 2001.113789. PMID: 11395707.
  37. Reisner KR, Levitt HL, Mante F. Enamel preparation for orthodontic bonding: a comparison between the use of a sandblaster and current techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111(4):366-373. doi: 10.1016/s0889 5406(97)80018-2. PMID: 9109581.
  38. Kiryk J, Matys J, Nikodem A, Burzyńska K, GrzechLeśniak K, Dominiak M, Dobrzyński M. The Effect of Er: YAG Laser on a Shear Bond Strength Value of Orthodontic Brackets to Enamel—A Preliminary Study. Materials. 2021;14(9):2093. doi: 10.3390/ ma14092093. PMID: 33919108.
  39. Biyiklioglu MK, Yilmaz B. Comparison of Er: YAG laser and acid etching methods prior to lingual retainer application in vitro. Lasers Dent Sci. 2019;3(3):199- 207. doi: 10.1007/s41547-019-00071-w.
  40. Yassaei S, Aghili H, KhanPayeh E, Goldani moghadam M. Comparison of shear bond strength of rebonded brackets with four methods of adhesive removal. Lasers Med Sci. 2014;29(5):1563-8. doi: 10.1007/s10103-013-1310-9. PMID: 23568626.
  41. Bearn DR. Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108(2):207- 13. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70085-4. PMID: 7625397.
  42. Årtun J, Urbye KS. The effect of orthodontic treatment on periodontal bone support in patients with advanced loss of marginal periodontium. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;93(2):143-148. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(88)90292 2. PMID: 3422529.
  43. Bearn DR, McCabe JF, Gordon PH, Aird JC. Bonded orthodontic retainers: the wire-composite interface. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.1997;111(1): 67-74. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70304-4. PMID: 9009926.