Document Type : Original Article


1 BDS, MDS, Private practitioner, New Delhi, India

2 BDS, Post Graduate Resident, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Sudha Rustagi College of Dental Sciences and Research, Faridabad, Haryana, India, 121002.

3 BDS, MDS, M Orth Diplomat, Indian Board of Orthodontics (IBO), Vice Principal, Professor and Head, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Sudha Rustagi College of Dental Sciences and Research, Faridabad, Haryana, India, 121002

4 BDS, MDS, Private Practitioner, Gurugram, Haryana, India

5 BDS, MDS, Research Associate, Faculty of Dentistry, Jamia Milia Islamia, New Delhi, India, 110025

6 BDS, MDS, Senior Lecturer, Department of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopaedics, Manav Rachna Dental College, Faridabad, Haryana, India, 121004

7 BDS, MDS, Private Practitioner, Dehradun, India


Aim: Among various retraction methods for space closure in first premolar extraction, the palatal approach is preferred to labial appliances in cases having high aesthetic demand. A finite element model and clinical randomized prospective trial was undertaken to determine the possibility of en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth using palatal TAD and a clear aligner-like appliance in patients undergoing extraction of maxillary first premolars and to study the effects of the above using three-dimensional scanned models and lateral cephalograms.
Methods: A finite element model of maxillary dentition with alveolar bone, an acrylic splint on six anterior teeth, palatal implants, and short e-chain were produced to measure shifting when force was applied from three various levels. Thereafter, the finite element analysis findings were applied to 10 patients requiring fixed orthodontic treatment with first premolar extraction and fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Impressions were made and the rate of retraction was evaluated at 4-week intervals by superimposition of scanned models.
Results: En-masse bodily retraction was seen when both canine hooks and palatal TAD was placed at 10 mm distance from the respective gingival margin. Clinically, subjects showed significant retraction at that level and statistically significant results in some cases. The maximum rate of retraction was seen in the first three months (average: 5.310 mm) with p-value <0.0001.
Conclusion: Translational tooth movement was observed when line of force was at the level of the center of resistance.


Main Subjects

  1. Agarwal SS, Jayan B, Chopra SS. An Overview of Malocclusion in India. J Dent Health Oral Disord Ther. 2015;3(3):319-322. doi: 10.15406/jdhodt.2015. 03.00092.
  2. Güray E, Orhan M. “En masse” retraction of maxillary anterior teeth with anterior headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112(5):473- 9. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70073-8.
  3. Park HS. A new protocol of the sliding mechanics with micro-implant anchorage (MIA). Korean J Orthod. 2000;30(6):677-85.
  4. Upadhyay M, Yadav S. Mini-implants for retraction, intrusion and protraction in a Class II division patient. J Orthod. 2007;34:158–67. doi: 10.1179/146531207225022140. PMID: 17761798.
  5. Jang HJ, Roh WJ, Joo BH, Park KH, Kim SJ, Park YG. Locating the center of resistance of maxillary anterior teeth retracted by Double J Retractor with palatal miniscrews. Angle Orthod. 2010;80(6): 1023-8. doi: 10.2319/121409 712.1. PMID: 20677950.
  6. Matsui S, Caputo AA, Chaconas SJ, Kiyomura H. Center of resistance of anterior arch segment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;118(2):171-8. doi: 10.1067/mod.2000.103774. PMID: 10935957.
  7. Machado RM. Space closure using aligners. Dental Press J Orthod. 2020;25(4):85-100. doi: 10.1590/2177- 6709.25.4.085-100.sar. PMID: 32965392.
  8. Chetan S, Keluskar KM, Vasisht VN, Revankar S. Enmasse retraction of the maxillary anterior teeth by applying force from four different levels–a finite element study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(9):26-30. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8408.4831. PMID: 25386516.
  9. Soper D. Calculator: a-priori sample size for student t-tests. Available online: .aspx?id=47
  10. Sia S, Koga Y, Yoshida N. Determining the center of resistance of maxillary anterior teeth subjected to retraction forces in sliding mechanics. An in vivo study. Angle Orthod. 2007;77(6):999-1003. doi: 10.2319/112206-478. PMID: 18004933
  11. Sia S, Shibazaki T, Koga Y, Yoshida N. Experimental determination of optimal force system required for control of anterior tooth movement in sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135(1):36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.01.034. PMID: 19121498.
  12. Burstone CJ. Application of bioengineering to clinical orthodontics. In: Graber TM, Swain BF, editors. Orthodontics, current principles and techniques. St. Louis: Mosby; 1985. p. 193-228.
  13. Nanda R, Ghosh J. Biomechanical considerations in sliding mechanics. In: Nanda R, editor. Biomechanics in clinical orthodontics. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 1997. p. 188-217.
  14. Burstone CJ, Pryputniewicz RJ. Holographic determination of centers of rotation produced by orthodontic forces. Am J Orthod. 1980;77(4):396- 409. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(80)90105-0. PMID: 6928741
  15. Issa Fathima Jasmine M, Arif Yezdani A, Tajir F, Murali Venu R. Analysis of stress in bone and microimplants during en-masse retraction of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth with different insertion angulations: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;141(1):71-80.
  16. Park JH, Kook YA, Kojima Y, Yun S, Chae JM. Palatal en-masse retraction of segmented maxillary anterior teeth: A finite element study. Korean J Orthod. 2019;49(3):188. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2019.49.3.188. PMID: 31149609.
  17. Almeida MA, Phillips C, Kula K, Tulloch C. Stability of the palatal rugae as landmarks for analysis of dental casts. Angle Orthod. 1995;65(1):43-8. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1995)065<0043:SOTPRA>2.0. CO;2. PMID: 7726462.
  18. Bailey LT, Esmailnejad A, Almeida MA. Stability of the palatal rugae as landmarks for analysis of dental casts in extraction and nonextraction cases. Angle Orthod. 1996;66(1):73-8. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1996)066 <0073:SOTPRA>2.3.CO;2. PMID: 8678349.
  19. Choi DS, Jeong YM, Jang I, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Cha BK. Accuracy and reliability of palatal superimposition of three-dimensional digital models. Angle Orthod. 2010;80(4):497—503. doi: 10.2319/101309-569.1. PMID: 20482354.