Document Type : Original Article


1 Post graduate student, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Narsinhbhai Patel Dental College and Hospital, Sankalchand Patel University, Visnagar, Gujarat, India

2 Professor and Head of Department, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Narsinhbhai Patel Dental College and Hospital, Sankalchand Patel University, Visnagar, Gujarat, India


Aim: The purpose of this questionnaire study was to determine what criteria lead potential orthodontic patients to choose a direct-to-consumer aligner company, orthodontist, or general dentist in north Gujarat, India.
Methods: A total of 100 potential orthodontic patients from the general population in north Gujarat participated in the study. Google Forms was used to send the questionnaire, and the data was recorded. Participants’ views on the type of provider they would prefer for their orthodontic treatment were tabulated. Data was entered in the software SPSS (v. 20.0) and statistical analysis was performed (p<0.05).
Results: A total of 58 females and 42 males from the general population (100 potential orthodontic patients) in north Gujarat responded to the questionnaire. The participants (45%) held the opinion that a direct-to-consumer aligner company could offer better cost of treatment, 62% of participants preferred an orthodontist for better quality of treatment, 56% of participants preferred a direct-to-consumer aligner company because they felt that it would be more convenient, and 49% of participants preferred an orthodontist because they felt they would offer better follow-up after orthodontic treatment.
Conclusion: Participants tended to prefer orthodontists because they felt they would receive better quality of treatment and follow-up, and more treatment options such as aesthetic treatment. However, they preferred direct-to-consumer aligner companies because of their convenience, lower cost, shorter treatment duration, and better customer service. For their child's orthodontic care, parents typically choose an orthodontist.


Main Subjects

  1. AAO. Economics of orthodontics & patient census. 2015. Available at: education/data andresearch.
  2. Kravitz ND, Jay Bowman S. A paradigm shift in orthodontic marketing. Semin Orthod. 2016;22:297-300. doi:
  3. 10.1053/J. SODO.2016.08.010.
  4. Koroluk LD, Jones JE, Avery DR. Analysis of orthodontic treatment by pediatric dentists and general practitioners in
    Indiana. ASDC J Dent Child. 1988;55:97-101. PMID: 2965169. 4. Wolsky SL, McNamara JA. Orthodontic services provided by general dentists. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.1996;110(2):211-7. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(96)70111-7. PMID: 8760849.
  5. Galbreath RN, Hilgers KK, Silveira AM, Scheetz JP. Orthodontic treatment provided by general dentists who have achieved master’s level in the Academy of General Dentistry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129:678- 86. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.10.018. PMID: 16679209.
  6. Vicens J, Russo A. Comparative use of Invisalign by orthodontists and general practitioners. Angle Orthod. 2010;80(3):425-34. doi: 10.2319/052309-292.1. PMID: 20050732.
  7. Behrents RG. Do-it-yourself impressions and clear retainers: a fairytale. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016; 150(2):205-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.06.010. PMID: 274 76344.
  8. Schneider S. The role and implications of “Do It Yourself” tooth movement. Dent Hypo. 2016;7(4):157-9. doi: 10.4103/ 2155-8213.195977.
  9. Padmanabhan S. Do it yourself orthodontics: alarmist or real? J Indian Orthod Soc. 2016;50:137.
  10. Spencer GW. What we have to offer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;154:8-9.
  11. Allareddy V, Nalliah R, Lee MK, Rampa S, Allareddy V. Adverse clinical events reported during Invisalign treatment: analysis of the MAUDE database. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017;152:706-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017. 06.014. PMID: 29103448.
  12. Marques LS, de Freitas Junior N, Pereira LJ, Ramos-Jorge ML. Quality of orthodontic treatment performed by orthodontists and general dentists. Angle Orthod. 2012; 82(1):102-6. doi: 10.2319/061311-389.1. PMID: 21806465.
  13. Best AD, Shroff B, Carrico CK, Lindauer SJ. Treatment management between orthodontists and general practitioners performing clear aligner therapy. Angle Orthod. 2017;87(3):432-9. doi: 10.2319/062616-500.1. PMID: 27874282.
  14. Abei Y, Nelson S, Amberman BD, Hans MG. Comparing orthodontic treatment outcome between orthodontists and
    general dentists with the ABO index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126(5):544-8. doi: 10.1016/j. ajodo.2003.11.020. PMID: 15520686.
  15. Walley EK, Silberman SL, Tuncay OC. Patient and parent preferences for orthodontic practices. Clin Orthod Res. 1999; 2(3):110-23. doi: 10.1111/ocr.1999.2.3.110. PMID: 10534 986.
  16. Edwards DT, Shroff B, Lindauer SJ, Fowler CE, Tufekci E. Media advertising effects on consumer perception of
    orthodontic treatment quality. Angle Orthod. 2008;78(5): 771-7. doi: 10.2319/083106-357.1. PMID: 18298216.
  17. Bedair TM, Thompson S, Gupta C, Beck FM, Firestone AR. Orthodontists’ opinions of factors affecting patients' choice of orthodontic practices. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;138(1):6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.020. PMID: 20620820.
  18. St Louis BL, Firestone AR, Johnston W, Shanker S, Vig KW. Prospective patients rate practice factors: development of a questionnaire. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139: 235-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.028. PMID: 21300253.
  19. Heath EM, English JD, Johnson CD, Swearingen EB, Akyalcin S. Perceptions of orthodontic case complexity among orthodontists, general practitioners, orthodontic residents, and dental students. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017;151(2):335-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.06.