Document Type : Original Article


1 Student Research Committee, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

3 Ph.D. candidate, School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

4 Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran



Objective: The aim of this study was to determine Bolton ratios in the Iranian orthodontically treated population of different malocclusions and compare these values among malocclusion groups and with Bolton reference values.
Methods: Bolton ratios of 210 subjects were investigated in three groups of Class I, II, and III skeletal patterns. The measurement of mesiodistal width of teeth was made on post-treatment dental models using a digital caliper. One-way analysis of variance and one-sample t-test were used to compare obtained anterior values and overall ratios among studied groups and with reference values, respectively. P-value<0.05 was considered as significant.
Results: The mean values of anterior ratio in total subjects were 76.77, and in the Class I skeletal pattern group was 76.51, which were significantly different from the reference value (p-value < 0.05). However, the differences in the mean anterior ratios of Class II and III groups and the mean overall ratios of three studied groups with reference values were not statistically significant. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the anterior and overall Bolton ratios of the three studied groups (p-value>0.05).
Conclusion: Since the obtained Bolton ratios in Class II and III groups were not significantly different from reference values, these values are also applicable for mild skeletal malocclusions. However, the difference in mean anterior ratios of the total 210 subjects and Class I group with Bolton reference values could be caused by racial differences or several factors related to orthodontic treatment, which can be investigated in subsequent studies.


Main Subjects

  1. Batool I, Abbas A, Rizvi SA, Abbas I. Evaluation of tooth size discrepancy in different malocclusion groups. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2008;20(4):51-4. Epub 2008/10/01. PubMed PMID: 19999204.
  2. Othman SA, Harradine NW. Tooth-size discrepancy and Bolton's ratios: a literature review. J Orthod. 2006;33(1):45 51; discussion 29. Epub 2006/03/04. doi: 10.1179/146531205225021384. PubMed PMID: 16514133.
  3. Jabri MA, Wu S, Zhang Y, Wang H, Pan Y, Ma J, et al. Accuracy of Bolton's Analysis among Different Malocclusion Patients Plaster Models and Digital Models Obtained by Ex Vivo Scanning with iTero Scanner in Chinese Han Population. Niger J Clin Pract. 2021;24(7):1086-91. Epub 2021/07/23. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_307_20. PubMed PMID: 34290188.
  4. Nourallah AW, Splieth CH, Schwahn C, Khurdaji M. Standardizing interarch tooth-size harmony in a Syrian population. Angle Orthod. 2005;75(6):996-9. Epub 2006/02/02. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[996: Sithia]2.0. Co;2. PubMed PMID: 16448244.
  5. Bolton WA. Disharmony in tooth size and its relation to the analysis and treatment of malocclusion. The Angle Orthodontist. 1958;28(3):113-30.
  6. Uysal T, Sari Z, Basciftci FA, Memili B. Intermaxillary tooth size discrepancy and malocclusion: is there a relation? Angle Orthod. 2005;75(2):208-13. Epub 2005/04/14. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)075<0204: Itsdam>2.0. Co;2. PubMed PMID: 15825784.
  7. Leung EMY, Yang Y, Khambay B, Wong RWK, McGrath C, Gu M. A Comparative Analysis of Tooth Size Discrepancy between Male and Female Subjects Presenting with a Class I Malocclusion. ScientificWorldJournal. 2018; 2018:7641908. Epub 2018/08/15. doi: 10.1155/2018/7641908. PubMed PMID: 30104915; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6076893.
  8. Akyalçin S, Doğan S, Dinçer B, Erdinc AM, Oncağ G. Bolton tooth size discrepancies in skeletal Class I individuals presenting with different dental angle Classifications. Angle Orthod. 2006;76(4):637-43. Epub 2006/07/01. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0637: Btsdis]2.0. Co;2. PubMed PMID: 16808571.
  9. Araujo E, Souki M. Bolton anterior tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Angle Orthod. 2003;73(3):307-13. Epub 2003/06/28. doi: 10.1043/0003- 3219(2003)073<0307: Batsda>2.0. Co;2. PubMed PMID: 12828440.
  10. 10. Bernabé E, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Toothwidth ratio discrepancies in a sample of Peruvian adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;125(3):361-5. Epub 2004/03/12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.04.008. PubMed PMID: 15014416.
  11. Trehan M, Agarwal S, Sharma S. Applicability of Bolton's analysis: A Study on Jaipur population. International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry. 2012;5(2):113.
  12. Uysal T, Sari Z. Intermaxillary tooth size discrepancy and mesiodistal crown dimensions for a Turkish population. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2005;128(2):226-30.
  13. Lew K, Keng S. Anterior crown dimensions and relationship in an ethnic Chinese population with normal occlusions. Australian Orthodontic Journal. 1991;12(2):105-9.
  14. Ta TA, Ling JY, Hägg U. Tooth-size discrepancies among different occlusion groups of southern Chinese children. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;120(5):556-8. Epub 2001/12/26. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.118998. PubMed PMID: 11709674.
  15. Santoro M, Ayoub ME, Arthur Pardi V, Cangialosi TJ. Mesiodistal crown dimensions and tooth size discrepancy of the permanent dentition of Dominican Americans. The Angle Orthodontist. 2000;70(4):303-7.
  16. Kachoei M, Atashi MHA, Pourkhamneh S. Bolton's intermaxillary tooth size ratios among Iranian schoolchildren. 2011.
  17. Mollabashi V, Soltani MK, Moslemian N, Akhlaghian M, Akbarzadeh M, Samavat H, et al. Comparison of Bolton ratio in normal occlusion and different malocclusion groups in Iranian population. Int Orthod. 2019;17(1):143-50. Epub 2019/02/17. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.01.005. PubMed PMID: 30770330.
  18. Machado V, Botelho J, Pereira D, Vasques M, Fernandes-Retto P, Proença L, et al. Bolton ratios in Portuguese subjects among different malocclusion groups. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2018;10(9): e864.
  19. Gaddam R, Arya S, Shetty KS. Incidence of Tooth Size Discrepancy in Different Groups of Malocclusion and its Relation to Extraction. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7(Suppl 1):48-53. Epub 2015/08/01. PubMed PMID: 26225105; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4516072.
  20. Lavelle C. Maxillary and mandibular tooth size in different racial groups and different occlusal categories. American journal of orthodontics. 1972;61(1):29-37.
  21. Alam MK, Iida J. Overjet, overbite and dental midline shift as predictors of tooth size discrepancy in a Bangladeshi population and a graphical overview of global tooth size ratios. Acta odontologica scandinavica. 2013;71(6):1520- 31.
  22. Rudolph DJ, Dominguez PD, Ahn K, Thinh T. The use of tooth thickness in predicting intermaxillary tooth-size discrepancies. Angle Orthod. 1998;68(2):133-8; discussion 9-40. Epub 1998/06/20. doi:10.1043/0003 3219(1998)068<0133: Tuotti>2.3. Co;2. PubMed PMID: 9564422.