Navid Naseri; Pedram Baghaeian; Maryam Javaherimahd; Fatemeh Gorjizadeh
Abstract
Background: It has been proved that, there's craniofacial asymmetry but much of this skeletal asymmetries are clinically ignorable. This asymmetry may exist in teeth size arranged in right and left sides of human mouth too. Orthodontists should pay attention to bilateral tooth asymmetry in treatment ...
Read More
Background: It has been proved that, there's craniofacial asymmetry but much of this skeletal asymmetries are clinically ignorable. This asymmetry may exist in teeth size arranged in right and left sides of human mouth too. Orthodontists should pay attention to bilateral tooth asymmetry in treatment planning stage.
Objectives: This study was conducted to demonstrate whether the difference between size of left and right side teeth is actual. Materials and Methods: A total of 200 plaster dental molds were used which were collected from a private practice in Tehran. A caliper with accuracy of 0.01 mm was used for measuring teeth and most teeth were measured twice and the average value was considered as the teeth size. In all cases, the Vernier calipers jaws were moved along the teeth longitudinal axis and the biggest width was measured in the contact point area. Results: In average 83.16% of left and right teeth in upper jaw and 83.66% of left and right teeth in the lower jaw were not symmetrical and teeth in the upper and lower jaws were completely similar 16.84% and 16.34%, respectively.
Conclusions: The result of the study showed that nearly 83% of teeth in maxilla and mandible are asymmetric in mesiodistal width. Mandibular second molar and canine showed the highest and lowest bilateral asymmetry respectively.
Mohammadkarim Soltani; Farzaneh Golfeshan; Reza Mahvelati Shamsabadi
Abstract
Background and aim: Clinical signs of tooth-size- arch length discrepancy are crowding, impaction, and incisor proclination. The controversy persists over whether to increase the size of the arch by expansion or decrease the size of the teeth by interproximal enamel reduction or extraction to resolve ...
Read More
Background and aim: Clinical signs of tooth-size- arch length discrepancy are crowding, impaction, and incisor proclination. The controversy persists over whether to increase the size of the arch by expansion or decrease the size of the teeth by interproximal enamel reduction or extraction to resolve the discrepancy.Method: This report describes the treatment of a 17-year-old girl with a severe tooth size-arch length discrepancy. The patient had a mild Class II skeletal relationship, a high mandibular plane angle, a Class I molar relationship, bilateral posterior cross bites, and deviated midlines. The final treatment protocol was non-extraction treatment of both arches using passive self-ligate brackets. Results and Conclusion: The final treatment result was satisfactory. Proper over- bite and over jet, facial balance and good occlusion were achieved. Expansion of posterior segments and distal movement of molars solved tooth size-arch length discrepancy.
Barat Ali Ramazanzadeh; Mostafa Shahabi; Mohsen Merati
Abstract
Aim: Determination of overall and anterior Bolton ratios in people having normal occlusion in Iran and checking the effect of sexuality upon Bolton ratios in the aforementioned population and pinpointing the ability to apply normal quantities offered by Bolton in the Iranian population.Materials and ...
Read More
Aim: Determination of overall and anterior Bolton ratios in people having normal occlusion in Iran and checking the effect of sexuality upon Bolton ratios in the aforementioned population and pinpointing the ability to apply normal quantities offered by Bolton in the Iranian population.Materials and methods: The study is a cross-sectional descriptive one by surveying study casts provided from 56 high school students (28 boys and 28 girls) having normal occlusions. Bolton ratios were considered in boys and girls separately. Statistical computations were conducted according to student t-test.Results: The total mesiodistal width of 12 permanent teeth and 6 anterior teeth in boys exceeded that of girls however this discrepancy has not statistically significant difference. The quantity of the overall and anterior Bolton ratios did not have statistically significant differences in boys and girls. The mean and standard deviation of the overall and anterior ratios in Iranian population were 91.58±2.03% and 77.73±3.17% which did not have statistically significant differences from the normal quantities offered by Bolton (P<0.05).Conclusion: The normal ratios offered by Bolton can be used in the Iranian boys and girls needing orthodontic treatments.
