Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute and Department of Orthodontics, Dental School, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Dentist, Private Practice

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to assess the frequency of using clear aligners by orthodontists and their perspective in this respect.
Methods: This descriptive-analytical study evaluated 86 orthodontists practicing in Iran in 2021. An online questionnaire was designed by an expert panel to collect information regarding the frequency of use of clear aligners (CA) by orthodontists, their satisfaction rate with this treatment approach, their perception of CA's advantages and disadvantages and the challenges they encountered while using CA. The results were analyzed by descriptive analysis methods and regression analysis.
Results: Eighty-six orthodontists filled out the questionnaire. Less than one-third of participants reported using CA, and the majority of them reported using it for less than 10% of their patients. Of those not using CA, 75% were interested in using them. The mean satisfaction score with CA was 9.26 out of 20. The main reason for not using CA was difficult access to reputable companies and suboptimal quality of work of the available laboratories. The majority of orthodontists stated that CA could not be used for cases with impacted teeth, orthognathic surgery patients, and syndromic, cleft lip and palate patients. The main shortcoming of CA was perceived to be in the space closure phase, and their cost was 50-100% higher than regular orthodontic treatment. Older orthodontists were less interested in using CA while faculty members were more interested.
Conclusion: The frequency of use of clear aligners by Iranian orthodontists is low and their satisfaction rate with this approach is <50%.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Olson JC, Shroff B, Carrico C, Boyle J, Lindauer SJ. Comparison of patient factors influencing the selection of an orthodontist, general dentist, or direct-to-consumer aligners. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020;157(4):526-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo. 2019.11.010. PMID: 32241359.
  2. Baxmann M, Timm LH, Schwendicke F. Who seeks clear aligner therapy? A european cross-national realworld data analysis. Life. 2022;13(1):65. doi: 10.3390/life13010065. PMID: 36676013.
  3. Wiechmann D, Gerß J, Stamm T, Hohoff A. Prediction of oral discomfort and dysfunction in lingual orthodontics: a preliminary report. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133(3):359-64. Doi: 10.10 16/j.ajodo.2006.03.045. PMID: 18331933.
  4. Melsen B. Northcroft lecture: how has the spectrum of orthodontics changed over the past decades? J Orthod. 2011;38(2):134-43. doi: 10.1179/1465312 1141362. PMID: 21677105.
  5. Borda AF, Garfinkle JS, Covell Jr DA, Wang M, Doyle L, Sedgley CM. Outcome assessment of orthodonticclear aligner vs fixed appliance treatment in a teenage population with mild malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 2020;90(4):485-90. doi: 10.2319/122919- 844.1. PMID: 33378505.
  6. Weir T. Clear aligners in orthodontic treatment. Aust Dent J. 2017; 62:58-62. doi: 10.1111/adj.12480. PMID: 28297094.
  7. Livas C, Delli K, Lee SJ, Pandis N. Public interest in Invisalign in developed and developing countries: A Google Trends analysis. J Orthod. 2022:1-10. doi: 10.1177/14653125221134304. PMID: 36314848.
  8. Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B, BeGole E, Obrez A, Agran B. How well does Invisalign work? A prospective clinical study evaluating the efficacy of tooth movement with Invisalign. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135(1):27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.05.018. PMID: 19121497.
  9. Krieger E, Seiferth J, Marinello I, Jung BA, Wriedt S, Jacobs C, et al. Invisalign® treatment in the anterior region. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie. J Orofac Orthop. 2012;73(5): 365-76. Doi: 10.1007/s00056-012-0097-9. PMID: 22890691.
  10. Djeu G, Shelton C, Maganzini A. Outcome assessment of Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment compared with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128(3):292-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo. 2005.06.002. PMID: 16168325.
  11. Gu J, Tang JS, Skulski B, Fields Jr HW, Beck FM, Firestone AR, et al. Evaluation of Invisalign treatment effectiveness and efficiency compared with conventional fixed appliances using the Peer Assessment Rating index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017;151(2):259-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo. 2016.06.041. PMID: 28153154.
  12. Kuncio D, Maganzini A, Shelton C, Freeman K. Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment postretention outcomes compared using the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system. Angle Orthod. 2007;77(5):864-9.
  13. Li WH, Wang SM, Zhang YZ. The effectiveness of the Invisalign appliance in extraction cases using the the ABO model grading system: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2019;12(1): 1324.
  14. Hennessy J, Garvey T, Al-Awadhi EA. A randomized clinical trial comparing mandibular incisor proclination produced by fixed labial appliances and clear aligners. Angle Orthod. 2016;86(5):706-12. doi: 10. 2319/101415-686.1. PMID: 27571371.
  15. Rossini G, Parrini S, Castroflorio T, Deregibus A, Debernardi CL. Efficacy of clear aligners in controlling orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2015;85(5):881-9. doi: 10.2319/06 1614-436.1. PMID: 25412265.
  16. Lagravere MO, Flores-Mir C. The treatment effects of Invisalign orthodontic aligners: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;136(12):1724-9. doi: 10.14219/ jada. archive.2005.0117. PMID: 16383056.
  17. Cardoso PC, Espinosa DG, Mecenas P, Flores-Mir C, Normando D. Pain level between clear aligners and fixed appliances: a systematic review. Prog Orthod. 2020;21(1):1-7. doi: 10.1186/s40510-019-0303-z. PMID: 31956934.
  18. Pereira D, Machado V, Botelho J, Proença L, Mendes JJ, Delgado AS. Comparison of pain perception between clear aligners and fixed appliances: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Appl Sci. 2020;10(12):4276. doi: 10.3390/app10124276
  19. Ackerman MB. Teleorthodontic treatment with clear aligners: An analysis of outcome in treatment supervised by general practitioners versus orthodontic specialists. J Dent Res. 2019; 2:1-4.
  20. Best AD, Shroff B, Carrico CK, Lindauer SJ. Treatment management between orthodontists and general practitioners performing clear aligner therapy. Angle Orthod. 2017;87(3):432-9. doi: 10.2319/062616- 500.1. PMID: 27874282.
  21. d’Apuzzo F, Perillo L, Carrico CK, Castroflorio T, Grassia V, Lindauer SJ, et al. Clear aligner treatment: different perspectives between orthodontists and general dentists. Prog Orthod. 2019;20(1):1-9. doi: 10.1186/s40510-019 0263-3. PMID: 30854613.
  22. Azaripour A, Weusmann J, Mahmoodi B, Peppas D, Gerhold-Ay A, Van Noorden CJ, et al. Braces versus Invisalign®: gingival parameters and patients’ satisfaction during treatment: a cross-sectional study. BMC oral health. 2015;15(1):1-5. doi: 10.1186/ s12903-015-0060-4. PMID: 26104387/
  23. Gaffuri F, Cossellu G, Lanteri V, Brotto E, Farronato M. Comparative effectiveness of Invisalign and fixed appliances in first-premolar extraction cases. J Clin Orthod. 2020;52(5):294-301. PMID: 32650336.
  24. Zhou N, Guo J. Efficiency of upper arch expansion with the Invisalign system. Angle Orthod. 2020;90(1): 23-30. doi: 10.2319/022719-151.1. PMID: 31368778.
  25. Galan-Lopez L, Barcia-Gonzalez J, Plasencia E. A systematic review of the accuracy and efficiency of dental movements with Invisalign®. Korean J Orthod. 2019;49(3):140-9. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2019.49.3.140. PMID: 31149604.